The state banquet at Windsor Castle on the evening of September 17, 2025, was held in St. George’s Hall, where it has been held for state visits in living memory. The British monarch and the visiting head of state each delivered remarks. The remarks of King Charles III, by the standard reckoning, were measured. The remarks of the President of the United States, by the same standard, were not.

Two passages from the President’s toast drew immediate attention. The first concerned the Princess of Wales, Catherine, whose treatment for cancer had been announced and concluded over the preceding eighteen months. Melania and I are delighted, the President said, to visit again with Prince William and to see Her Royal Highness Princess Catherine so radiant, and so healthy, and so beautiful. The line was delivered to a room in which the Princess herself was seated within the President’s eyeline.

The second passage was the toast itself. On behalf of all Americans, the President said, I offer a toast to one of the great friendships, two great countries, and to His Majesty, King Charles III, a very, very special man and also a very, very special Queen. The toast on its surface was offered to King Charles III and the Queen. The Queen referred to is Camilla, Charles’s wife. The toast did not name her. The toast referred to her via the King.

The British protocol point, made by every major British paper Thursday morning, was that personal remarks about the appearance of a senior royal woman are, by long-standing tradition, not done. The form of a state banquet toast, in particular, calls for the appraisal of the relationship between two countries, with the personal qualities of the host limited to office. The President’s appraisal of the Princess of Wales did not stay within those bounds.

The form here is what is at issue. A state visit is a piece of choreography developed across centuries. The choreography is not a constraint on the visiting president’s freedom of expression. The choreography is the expression. The fact that the King’s remarks were measured and the President’s were extemporaneous is, in the language of the visit, a finding. The finding is reported back, in cables, to capitals.

The state banquet ended on schedule. The Princess of Wales smiled. The orchestra played. The President left for Chequers in the morning, having toasted the King’s wife by reference and the King’s daughter-in-law by appearance.

A serious country sends its President to dinner with the form intact. The form is the message. The departures from the form are also messages. They are read carefully, abroad.

Calmly documenting the decline.

FINAL · /100

The breakdown.

  • Factual basis The transcript is on file at Factba.se.
    17/25
  • Self-awareness The protocol point was made by every UK paper by Thursday.
    5/20
  • Staff containment The remarks were prepared. Several lines were extemporaneous.
    9/20
  • Recovery attempt None offered.
    6/15
  • Public spectacle Carried live across BBC, ITV, and Sky.
    14/20

Was this dumb enough?

Members can adjust the score. Become a member.

Underlying fact — Roll Call